MediaTek Helio P70 has a AnTuTu benchmark score of 191604 and MediaTek Helio P35 has AnTuTu score of 99120. Also, this processor bears a performance resemblance to the HiSilicon Kirin 650.What is the difference between MediaTek Helio P70 and MediaTek Helio P35? Should you buy phone having MediaTek Helio P70 or should go for MediaTek Helio P35? Well, you'll get all your questions cleared here.Compare two chipset models on the basis of their benchmark score (AnTuTu and Geekbench), pros and cons, technical specs categorised into gaming, CPU, GPU, Multimedia, and Connectivity. The only mid-range processor which exceeds the performance of the Helio P35 is the Snapdragon 660. The chipset undoubtedly stands ahead of the likes of Snapdragon 625 and almost parallels the performance of Snapdragon 675 while landing a few steps behind the Snapdragon 636. Technical jargon aside, when it comes to real life performance, the Helio P35 is a new contender in the mid-range segment which will promise impressive performance. If there is one area where the Helio P35 sees defeat it’s in the case of integrated LTE which is supported by both Snapdragon 660 and the Snapdragon 675. However, when it comes to CPU speeds, the SD 675 stands beaten as it only gets two cores clocking 2 GHz and six cores clocking 1.7 GHz which is less as compared to the Helio P35 or the Snapdragon 660. In an overall comparison, the Snapdragon 675 also stands just a little ahead of the Helio P35 owing to the even smaller semiconductor size of 11nm. The SoC also enables a hardware depth engine for professional-level bokeh images alongside Electronic Image Stabilization (EIS) and Rolling Shutter Compensation (RSC) which does away with motion blur in images. The phone with Helio P35 can sport either dual 13MP or a single 25MP sensor on the front. This chipset also supports LPDDR3 and LPDDR4x RAM which can be either 4GB and 6GB and eMMC 5.1 storage. When it comes to graphics, the Helio P35 supports Full HD+ display and supports up to 20:9 aspect ratio displays. Also, the cores of the Helio P35 are clocked at 2.3 GHz whereas the cores of Snapdragon clock up to 2.2 GHz. The difference in the benchmark scores and the slight difference in performance too is likely because the MediaTek processor is built on a 12nm process as opposed to the 14nm process which Snapdragon uses for the 636. However, when it comes to competing with the Snapdragon 636, the chipset is a little behind. On running a simple benchmark test, it becomes evident that the MediaTek Helio P35 scores a better score as compared to the Snapdragon 625. Helio P35 vs Snapdragon 625, Snapdragon 636 and Snapdragon 660 Furthermore, an LTE radio with Cat-7 (300 Mbps download) Cat-12 (150 Mbps upload) along with 802.11 a/b/g/n Wi-Fi modem is integrated. The integrated memory controller supports LPDDR4x with 1500 MHz or 933 MHz LPDDR3. The integrated graphics card is PowerVR GE8320 and clocks with up to 680 MHz. The four performance cores clock up to 2.3 GHz. On the other hand, the MediaTek Helio P35 is a much more recent chipset, and this one integrates eight ARM Cortex-A53 cores in two clusters (big.LITTLE). This chipset also supports 802.11ac Wi-Fi and Bluetooth 4.1. Firstly the Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 is an octa-core SoC with eight ARM Cortex-A53 CPU cores firing up to 2 GHz paired with an Adreno 506 GPU, a DDR3L-1866 memory controller and an X9 LTE (Cat 7, 4G+, 300 Mbps down, 150 Mbps up) modem. Helio P35 and Snapdragon 625 Chipset Architectureīefore we move on to the comparison between these chipsets, it is important to understand the underlying architecture and the hardware which these chipsets come with.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |